Having a bigger say in development

"The estimation of the size and economic significance of the sector means that there could be large and vital social resources out there and more needs to be known about it. In particular, the state's main statistical agency - Statistics South Africa - should be mandated and resourced to regularly collect and publish information on the sector."

He adds that there is a need to question the notion of public-private partnerships that define the state and the private sector as the only relevant actors in policy-making and delivery.

"Although it is already present in a number of policy documents, more needs to be done to emphasise and strengthen the notion of the three-way relationship between state, private sector and the non-profit sector."

There is, he says, strong anecdotal and case study evidence that the social capital of South Africa's society is embedded within and sustained by a vast array of non-profit organisational forms that relate in one way or another to every aspect of social life.

"In terms of strategy, alliances and networks are going to be important determinants of who wins and loses in the new game. Until now, non-profit organisations have perceived the lack of a sustainable funding base and of organisational and managerial capacity as their two major problems."

Other perceived problems were the lack of government support and a paucity of public contributions.

"The qualitative survey revealed that while we need an effective public policy and legal framework for channeling funds to NPOs, the government is moving in the right direction." He concludes that "the South African NPO study reiterates the importance of knowing more about the non-profit sector".

Statistics South Africa, together with the department of social development, the Reserve Bank, the South African Revenue Service, and the National Development Agency, should collaborate to ensure that the kind of information we have collected continues to be collected and published. Ideally, a similar method should be used.

All key stakeholders will gain:

A more accurate picture of the contribution of the non-profit sector to gross domestic product, total employment, and poverty elimination.
A much clearer picture of revenue flows, demonstrating in particular the impact of state funding on poverty, and the size of non-profit contributions to the sector and how they are used.

In addition, the NPO sector will be able to enhance its identity and knowledge of its role in the development and democratic process.

"No better rationale can be advanced for justifying this claim on South Africa's scarce public resources."

The report predicts a markedly different reality for NPOs compared to what they confronted before 1994. It points out that in the short to medium term the country's economic position is unlikely to change.

This will fuel the oppositional political discourse of the labour movement and the radical NPOs, which are increasingly defining their identity and arguments in terms of a globalised, anti-neo-liberalism platform.

Their rhetoric and strategic outlook are consciously aimed at undermining co-optive strategies for constructing and sustaining the institutional infrastructure of the public space that is required and for realizing social, economic and political objectives.

Ironically, the left-wing build-up is exactly what may keep the corporatist pact in place, as the private sector and the state collaborate to maintain or increase social spending via NPOs.

On the other hand, the government will probably increase pressure on NPOs to align their priorities with its own development project. And, as the role of local government increases in importance, it will have profound implication for NPO activity. Engagement between the two will be at an increasing localised and fragmented level.

Source: Sunday Independent, 18 August 2002 (editorial: Loraine Tulleken)